SOAR, EDR, identity, and cloud-security vendors
Keep autonomous remediation inside the customer mandate while your product detects, investigates, and proposes the response.
EMILIA Gate for automated security actions
Let AI defend the system. Keep the authority to change it.
Your security product detects the threat and proposes the response. EMILIA controls the exact administrative action at the credential-owning boundary before it can change the customer's system.
On a completely mediated credential path: one covered provider attempt per accepted authorization. Outside the mandate: refuse. Outcome unknown: stop and reconcile.
Built for security vendors, MSSPs, SOC platforms, and integrators. It is not a threat detector.
Concept illustration · completely mediated credential path
1
AI asksDisable this one work account.
2
EMILIA checksExact action. Exact target. One permission.
3
The door answersAdmit, refuse, or stop and check.
Decision receiptWhat was asked. What EMILIA decided. What is actually known.
The missing control
A valid credential does not mean this exact response was authorized.
Cyber-capable AI is being asked to investigate and remediate at machine speed. The hard question arrives after detection: may this agent disable this identity, isolate this host, or change this rule now?
IAM identifies the workload. Security products decide what to propose. EMILIA gives the customer a separate consequence boundary where finite authority survives outside the agent process and wider work fails closed.
Who we are inviting
Start with teams already putting AI defenders into customer environments.
EMILIA is an authority component inside their deployment, not a replacement SOC or security platform.
MSSPs and agentic SOC teams
Let an AI defender act at machine speed without turning a standing credential into open-ended authority.
OT and critical-infrastructure integrators
Add a bounded, customer-owned consequence control to existing defensive deployments without replacing the security or safety stack.
Interactive product story
Pressure-test one defensive action before it reaches the provider.
This browser-only simulation changes no system. It shows the four control states a real pilot must demonstrate at a completely mediated credential boundary.
AUTHORITY BOUNDARY / LOCAL SIMULATIONNO EXTERNAL ACTION
Frozen request
- operation
identity.disable- target
svc-billing-prod- evidence
- Current incident + customer mandate
- authority
- Available → reserved once
GATE VERDICTADMITTED
Provider entryOne attempt may enter
The frozen operation, target, incident binding, and evidence match the customer mandate. Admission permits one provider attempt; it does not prove the provider succeeded.
Identity is not action authority.Admission is not provider success.
Start narrow in every sector
Protect an administrative action before touching a safety-critical one.
Each row is a separate deployment profile, with its own customer mandate, executor, and bypass review.
EnvironmentCredible first actionOutside the claim
Enterprise securityDisable one compromised service identityNot threat detection or incident attribution
HospitalsTerminate one privileged administrative sessionNot a clinical decision or care-system safety claim
Public powerRevoke one remote IT access pathNot grid switching or operational reliability
Water systemsApply one bounded defensive network ruleNot chemical dosing or safety-instrumented control
One Consequential Action Drill
One action. One executor. Four hostile conditions. One honest boundary report.
Begin with a free 45-minute Authority Boundary Review. If the path is suitable, the existing $25K protected-workflow pilot turns it into a buyer-reviewed control design and evidence package. Production activation is separately scoped after acceptance.
- 01Map one action surface
Use the local scanner and operator interviews to identify the mutating API, credential owner, alternate paths, and evidence blind spots.
- 02Pin the customer mandate
The customer defines the exact operation, target, limits, evidence, expiry, and exception path. Gate refuses a wider action on the covered path.
- 03Place Gate beside the credential
The agent proposes the action without holding the provider credential. Gate checks the frozen action before the adapter enters the provider.
- 04Pressure-test refusal
Demonstrate exact admission, target substitution refusal, one-time replay refusal, and indeterminate outcome handling.
- 05Deliver re-performable evidence
Return the path map, accepted boundary, limitations, test record, and action-bound evidence package for buyer review.
The honest boundary
EMILIA controls covered consequences. It does not decide what the threat is.
What Gate can establish
- The exact proposed action matched accepted customer authority.
- The admitted authority was reserved and consumed once.
- A wider, stale, missing, or replayed action was refused before provider entry.
- An uncertain provider result remained explicit instead of triggering blind retry.
What remains outside
- Threat detection, attribution, exploit prevention, or incident correctness.
- Any credential or executor path that bypasses the deployed boundary.
- Whether an authorized response was wise, safe, lawful, or clinically correct.
- Physical effect or provider success without authenticated outcome evidence.
Buyer questions
Scope before slogans.
Does EMILIA detect or stop cyberattacks?
No. EMILIA is not an EDR, SIEM, SOAR, vulnerability scanner, or threat-detection model. It controls selected consequential actions on completely mediated paths after a defender or security product proposes them.
What security actions can EMILIA control?
A pilot starts with one customer-selected administrative mutation, such as disabling one identity, isolating one endpoint, terminating one privileged session, or applying one bounded network rule. Each action and executor requires a separately reviewed boundary.
What happens when a provider result is uncertain?
If the provider may have received an admitted action but its effect cannot be established, Gate treats the outcome as INDETERMINATE, keeps the authority consumed, and refuses blind retry until authenticated action-bound reconciliation.
Can an agent bypass EMILIA Gate?
Gate prevents only on completely mediated covered paths. Alternate credentials, direct provider calls, unprotected tools, and other executor routes remain outside coverage until they are removed or separately mediated.
Who is the initial target buyer for this solution?
We are inviting cybersecurity vendors, MSSPs, SOAR or EDR platforms, and critical-infrastructure integrators already deploying automated remediation. EMILIA adds a customer-owned exact-action authority boundary; it does not replace the customer's security product.
Bring one real action
Your AI defender can move fast without receiving open-ended authority.
We will map the boundary, name the bypasses, and pressure-test the refusal path before production reliance.
Scope one protected action